Moral's in Modern Culture Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Moral's in Modern Culture - Research Paper Example The end of this one man challenge would determine the victor, and those, who lost, would be subdued. The event is avidly described in 1 Samuel 17:41-58 where David approaches the battle line and upon exchanging a few words with Goliath, he hastens towards him, draws out his sling and a stone and with one swing, hits the giant on the forehead, stone sinks and he dies (â€Å"Bible Gateway passage,† n.d.-b). However, the text in 2 Samuel 21:18-22 is the primary source of contradiction. Verse 19 of the text states that a Jair’s son, Elhanan, killed the brother of Goliath. In the footnote of New International Version, it remarks that the original Hebrew text lacks the part â€Å"the brother ofâ€Å", which can then imply that the text originally read that Elhanan killed Goliath (â€Å"Bible Gateway passage,† n.d.-c). There may be a valid argument in that viewpoint, but the text in 1 Chronicles 20:4-8 can help clear the contradiction. The text in that excerpt briefly describes the same events described in 2 Samuel 21:18-22 but there are no footnotes indicating that the words â€Å"the brother of† was absent in the original text (â€Å"Bible Gateway passage,† n.d.-a). This impression is applied, therefore, in the interpretation of the verse in second Samuel. With such developments, it is pretty much clear that Elhanan killed Goliath’s brother, and not Goliath. The event of Goliath being slain is well described in the text 1st Samuel that is convincing enough that David killed Goliath. In the readings provided, there are two people presented to have killed Goliath. The first one is David; son of Jesse, the Bethlehemite and the second is Elhanan, son of a Bethlememite man, Jair. In the 1 Samuel 17:41-58 text, David is vividly described to have killed Goliath, with a clear demonstration of events that took place during that day. This writing, therefore, supports the fact that David killed Goliath way better than

The most Dangerous Game The hunter becomes the Hunted Research Paper

The most Dangerous Game The hunter becomes the Hunted - Research Paper Example For instance, the story revolves under learning and experience. Moreover, it talks of the how the hunter ends up hunted. The story elaborates how moralities are tested and how an individual eventually learns the hard way. Richard Connell uses irony in the short story to portray his message of learning and experience. The main irony portrayed in the story is the fact that Rainsford who is the hunter, becomes hunted. Rainsford believes in the world of hunting where he regards hunting as the best sport that ever existed in the world (Connell Richard, 8). In the beginning of the story, Rainsford views the world as a place with only two classes that include the hunters and the hunted. As a hunter he travels with his colleges on sport hunting where on their way, they are met by misfortune and fall off their yacht and Rainsford swims to an assumed safety on Ship-Trap Island (Connell Richard, Connell Richard, 11). Indeed it is depicted as trap Island since whoever finds himself/herself in the Island, never comes out of the Island alive. At the Island, he meets General Zaroff who turns merciful and treats him with the utmost respect (Connell Richard, 16). Zaroff later discloses his personality to Rainsford. It is ironical for Rainsford who is the hunter eventually becomes the next target to be hunted. As a hunter, Rainsford treats his prey with no mercy yet as the prey, he is treated with the utmost respect. It is ironical for Rainsford to fall in the trap and become the prey yet he believes himself as the hunter. The second irony portrayed in the short story is the Rainsford’s view of how the prey feels when being hunted. According to Rainsford, the prey understands not even a little bit, of what is happening. Therefore, it is of no importance to care about the feelings of the prey. His friend Whitney tells him that the prey is ever subjected to fear as it meets its death. Ironically, Rainsford only laughs at the comment but